optimistontour.com
  • Archives
  • September14th

    Today I meet Bill Mitchell, head of MITs ‘Smart Cities’ group. Bill’s an avuncular, friendly Australian who has a rather charming habit of saying incredible insightful things that seem remarkably obvious until you realise you haven’t heard anyone say them before. Originally from the Australian bush Bill’s come a long way, to be one of the world’s most respected thinkers on how cities evolve and how they can serve their citizens and the planet (including being part of the solution to global warming). In his native land his lectures sell out instantly. He’s become something of an architectural celebrity.

    One of his key themes is the cycles of ‘fragmentation and recombination’ that manifest as new technologies arrive on the scene. For instance, the village well loses its ‘focal point’ status when you get piped water. Now the focal point becomes the tap. It used to be that if you wanted to hear a song you had to go to see it performed, but technology advanced so you could listen to it on the radio, and now you can carry it around (along with a million others) in your pocket. In fact today you can pluck almost any song out the air (don’t you just love ‘Spotify’?). Years ago, if you wanted to make a telephone call you used to have be where the telephone was, now you can talk anywhere there’s cell phone coverage. The architectural shrines we made to facilitate private conversations (telephone boxes) are slowly disappearing. The role of the office is evolving too, as mobile technologies make the need to be next to your paper filing cabinet no longer an imperative. The office won’t completely disappear of course – humans need to get together – but it will become “a much more humane, collegiate space”. “When any place can be a work place there’s no excuse for making it anything other than a human, people-centred wonderful place,” says Bill. “You need to build environments that encourage serendipitous interaction, that encourage people to bump into each other. It’s important to make a great café for instance. I’ve a very strong belief in the potential of people to do amazing things if you just get out the way. We now have technology that is good enough to just work, but get out the way”.

    I wonder what technologies are coming down the line that will drive further fragmentation and recombination? One is likely to be power generation, particularly as solar power becomes cheaper and more efficient. When you can generate your power where you are and take your building, your company, your house, yourself potentially ‘off-grid’ another beneficial untying from a fixed, mandated framework occurs, another one of Bill’s ‘fragmentations’. In the back of my mind a thought starts to niggle… ‘When might something like this happen to our political structures?’ Indeed a thesis about how an increasingly networked world interacts with archaic hierarchical bureaucracy and government is beginning to form… maybe it’ll be one of the themes in the book. Networks subvert hierarchies, and our networks in many spaces are growing and becoming more responsive…

    Naturally there was a lot more we talked about that I’ll cover in the book, including the coalescence of Bill’s work with that of Cynthia Breazeal – and how our buildings may become sensate social beings that know us and work with us, dynamically adapting to our moods and needs. We also talked about how becoming less tied to infrastructure allows us to connect more readily around values. We also discussed how old cities can be adapted over time to become smarter, Bill talking about various doses of ‘urban viagra’. Indeed.

    Returning to my hotel I meet Kris and Arthur at the bar – a lovely couple from San Francisco, along with a gay couple (I didn’t get their names) who taught me the phrase ‘full frontal nerdity’. Arthur works for Google, being one of the brains behind their ‘Android’ mobile operating system. He’s interested in the book and asks if I’d like him to arrange  a ‘Google Talk’ when I’m at the Google campus in January. I’m flabbergasted. The Google Talks I’ve seen have been given by the likes of the people I’m interviewing, not novice authors, but he insists my journey and observations would be of interest. Arthur and Kris are generous and lively conversationalists and by coincidence we find out we’ll be in Sydney at the same time in November. They’re also coming to London to live of a while. I think I’ve made some new friends.

  • September12th

    It’s the weekend, and I’m trying to relax – but finding it hard. Thing is, next week is choc-a-bloc with interviews with a wide spectrum of interesting thinkers and so I’m swatting up and thinking of good questions. Monday is Bill Mitchell, head of MIT’s Smart Cities group, Tuesday I visit ‘thin film’ solar panel manufacturers Konarka, Wednesday is Juan Enriquez (I’m particularly looking forward to this) and Friday the mighty Wally Broecker (of ‘er, folks I’ve discovered climate change’ fame) and Klaus Lackner (hopefully to be of ‘er, I think I’ve solved climate change’ fame) – all people I not only want to ask good questions of, but who themselves are pre-eminent question askers.

    isidor rabi

    Thanks Mum

    There’s a great quote from Nobel Prize winning physicist Isidor Rabi that I often trot out in my day job (co-running learning consultancy Flow Associates). Asked why he became a scientist he replied, “My mother made me a scientist without ever intending it. Every other Jewish mother in Brooklyn would ask her child after school: ‘So? Did you learn anything today?’ But not my mother. She always asked me a different question. ‘Izzy,’ she would say, ‘did you ask a good question today?’ That difference – asking good questions – made me become a scientist!”

    There’s a kind of semi-carnival going on outside my hotel, with the fringe benefit that food stalls of all nationalities are serving up steaming portions of culinary goodness. I spend half an hour trying to choose something to eat. With my brain full of genomics, the future of energy and the implications of climate change choosing what to have for lunch suddenly becomes an intractable problem. It’s like my brain has switched into a different gear – and it’s finding it hard to shift to the ‘mundane’ task of choosing what to chow down on. I should be enjoying the atmosphere, the music, the smells, the joy of travelling in a foreign city but I’m distracted. Standing on the corner of Main St. and Vassar St. in Cambridge is, after all, like standing at one of the focal points of our future. If you wander a block in any direction you’ll find laboratories and research institutions that are creating new knowledge (and applications for it) at an incredible rate. Take the Broad Institute for instance, a joint venture between Harvard and MIT, “to pioneer a ‘new model’ of collaborative science [to] transform medicine.” Just down the road is The McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT created “with a mandate to use neuroscience to help people with brain disorders, and to ultimately benefit all of mankind by improving human communication and understanding.” The MIT media lab is round the corner on Ames St where “unorthodox research approaches” envision “the impact of emerging technologies on everyday life—technologies that promise to fundamentally transform our most basic notions of human capabilities”. In the Stata centre you’ll find the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. The list goes on and on… If the future wanted a zip code, I’m standing in the middle of one of the strongest contenders.

    MIT attracts people who ask good questions. Playful minds with a strong desire to find out ‘new stuff’. MIT encourages us to ask ‘What?’, ‘When?’ and ‘How?’ but also seems to have a strong emphasis on ‘Why?’ I’m beginning to feel I want to live here. You can almost smell the spirit of enquiry. It’s in the brick, the sidewalk. I walk past a advertisement that says “For rent: office and laboratory space”. Even the estate agents know that to sell in Cambridge MA, you sell by saying ‘discover stuff here’.  Charles Kettering the inventor once said “My interest is in the future because I am going to spend the rest of my life there. ” If he’d been alive today he might have said, “so I’m moving to Boston…”